Off the Charts !!!

[JonTerry]

Hi Dudes,

I'm normally pretty good with Dating Bucks but this Tang Stamp has me in a bit of twist ??

Is this another stamp for 1987 ??

Please help me out guys.

Cheers

JT

[dlr110]

Have you emailed the pic's to buck@buckknives.com and asked them?

[Railsplitter]

As I understand it, Buck sometimes used dots to designate a change. For example, a change of blade steel or other notable change.

The dot is not part of the date code.

[JonTerry]

Have you emailed the pic's to buck@buckknives.com and asked them?

Na mate thought somebody here would know

[JonTerry]

As I understand it, Buck sometimes used dots to designate a change. For example, a change of blade steel or other notable change.

The dot is not part of the date code.

The plot thickens then .....Doh

[Mumbleypeg]

Seems to me if the dot is not part of the date code it makes it quite clear.

Ken

[JonTerry]

Seems to me if the dot is not part of the date code it makes it quite clear.

Ken

True Ken,

It would suggest 1987 but what changes did they make that year to warrant the dot ???

Cheers

JT

[Mumbleypeg]

Seems to me if the dot is not part of the date code it makes it quite clear.

Ken

True Ken,

It would suggest 1987 but what changes did they make that year to warrant the dot ???

Cheers

JT

That’s a different question. And above my pay grade.

Ken

[Railsplitter]

I should have clarified that the dot is not part of the date code on the OP's example.

Here's a 505 that I used to have with that same dot. Pre-1986 so the date code is not a factor on this example.

[ScoutKnives]

I was told the dot was a hardness / heat treatment test .

Mike

[JonTerry]

I was told the dot was a hardness / heat treatment test .

Mike

It is for Puma Knives but never heard about Buck doing it ?
The dot on a Puma blade is the actual dent left after testing

[ScoutKnives]

There is a thread over on bladeforms about the dot on buck knives .

I was told the dot was a hardness / heat treatment test .

Mike

It is for Puma Knives but never heard about Buck doing it ?
The dot on a Puma blade is the actual dent left after testing

[Bamarick]

JonTerry,
I have a model 619 here somewhere mint in the box. It too has the dot before the marking. I researched this marking since I hadn't seen it before and I came across an article that at least satisfied my curiosity. As you know, Buck started their date code system in 1986. This article states that there are blade stampings out there that do not show up in the date code charts. The article goes on to say that in 1987 Buck made a run of about 4800 of the 703 Colt. The sheepsfoot blade on the 703 could be found with the single dot. It says that in this case Buck was testing a 441 stainless steel. The article goes on to say that there are also versions of the 110 and 112 that have markings not found on the date charts. I guess the true answer to these variations could only be answered by Buck. I hope this helps. Have a great day,---Rick

[JonTerry]

JonTerry,
I have a model 619 here somewhere mint in the box. It too has the dot before the marking. I researched this marking since I hadn't seen it before and I came across an article that at least satisfied my curiosity. As you know, Buck started their date code system in 1986. This article states that there are blade stampings out there that do not show up in the date code charts. The article goes on to say that in 1987 Buck made a run of about 4800 of the 703 Colt. The sheepsfoot blade on the 703 could be found with the single dot. It says that in this case Buck was testing a 441 stainless steel. The article goes on to say that there are also versions of the 110 and 112 that have markings not found on the date charts. I guess the true answer to these variations could only be answered by Buck. I hope this helps. Have a great day,---Rick

Thanks for this Rick,
I think I'll keep hold of this one for a while as I was going to sell it, but this Dot thing has pricked my curiosity and could mean that you and I have something quite rare !!!

Cheers

JT

[ea42]

The only reasonable explanantion I've heard regarding those dots is that they signified a mid-year change. Could have been anything, even something internal or a hole size that you can't see. I've seen a photo of a 422 from the same year with the same dot so it might have been a change that went across a number of models from that year.

Eric

[Mumbleypeg]

I think I'll keep hold of this one for a while as I was going to sell it, but this Dot thing has pricked my curiosity and could mean that you and I have something quite rare !!!

Cheers

JT

Just don’t mistake rare to mean valuable. Value requires supply AND demand.

Ken

[JonTerry]

I think I'll keep hold of this one for a while as I was going to sell it, but this Dot thing has pricked my curiosity and could mean that you and I have something quite rare !!!

Cheers

JT

Just don’t mistake rare to mean valuable. Value requires supply AND demand.

Ken

True,

But I reckon the Dot will make it a bit more rare, so maybe another 20-30 Bucks on Value ?
There are a few online around the $160-200 mark so I'll keep an eye on them.

JT

[Mumbleypeg]

Keep wishing. I wouldn't plan having lunch on it though.

Ken

[JonTerry]

Keep wishing. I wouldn't plan having lunch on it though.

Ken

Just gotta snag the Dude who wants this Dot model ........he may even know what it means lol

[JonTerry]

JonTerry,
I have a model 619 here somewhere mint in the box. It too has the dot before the marking. I researched this marking since I hadn't seen it before and I came across an article that at least satisfied my curiosity. As you know, Buck started their date code system in 1986. This article states that there are blade stampings out there that do not show up in the date code charts. The article goes on to say that in 1987 Buck made a run of about 4800 of the 703 Colt. The sheepsfoot blade on the 703 could be found with the single dot. It says that in this case Buck was testing a 441 stainless steel. The article goes on to say that there are also versions of the 110 and 112 that have markings not found on the date charts. I guess the true answer to these variations could only be answered by Buck. I hope this helps. Have a great day,---Rick

So mate can we assume mine is 441 steel ??

[Bamarick]

JonTerry,
No, I wouldn't assume your knife is made with 441 steel. The knife mentioned in the article was a 703 Colt, of which a run of around 4800 knives were made with 441 steel. As for the dot before the year stamping on the 1987 model 619, who knows? It could be just about anything. I'm not an expert on Buck knives but perhaps someone will come along with a better explanation. As for rarity and value I've seen these knives in the same range as you mentioned. Your knife and mine are the only two from 1987 I've seen, and both have the dot. I guess it's possible that all the 1987 model 619 knives have the same dot. I had mine on a table at several shows and had it priced far below those prices. I didn't even get an offer on it. Here in Alabama I doubt that anyone would view it as a rare collectable. They are looking for something for hunting purposes. There are a lot of knives that are better suited for that purpose and they can be had at a lower price.---Rick

[JonTerry]

Thanks Rick

I’ve just had a photo of a post from another forum regarding this date with the dot on 110’s
Apparently Joe Houser (whoever he is ? Presumably someone from Buck ?) wrote an article about this strange marking and doesn’t have an answer ??

Will we ever know ???

Are fixed blades marked differently to folders ?
Or do we have the lottery winning knives in our hands

[KLJ77]

According to Larry Oden in his book; "Holding An Edge", all "dots" on the tang are indicative to changes made to a particular knife, such as steel change, internal changes, etc. Keep in mind though, Buck's 'date chart' had 'dots' in their year dates from 2011 - 2021, and have nothing to do with any type of change.

Here are two excerpts from Larry's book. I know they don't relate to your 619 (87 model), but bottom line is; a specific dot outside the date chart, is indicative to 'some' sort of change. I suspect that; your dot may be indicative to a steel change from 440C to 425...it meets the timeline of 1987. (speculation on my part) The dot(s) don't add any value to the knife itself. It's all about a change that was made.

[JonTerry]

Brilliant
This is the closest e got so far