Western Bowie
Western Bowie
I read the threads on the Western Bowie from what I read it appears the one I have is the first version 1965-1966? thanks for your help
-
- Posts: 13373
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:36 pm
- Location: West Kootenays, B.C.
Re: Western Bowie
I cannot say for sure it is the first of the Western 49's but it looks to have been buffed. I have never seen one with a mirror finish before. We do have a member who is an expert on this knife. Hope he chimes in.
kj
kj
Re: Western Bowie
Yes, it is an early version, like KJ says, it looks heavily buffed as does your Case hunting knife. The early ones did not have a super shiny finish although the later models did have a crocus finish. Some folks likes 'em shiny, many prefer original finish.
- zzyzzogeton
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
- Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie
Re: Western Bowie
Yes, it is one of the first post-WW2/KW versions. 1964 to 1965 or maybe early 1966. The first ads for these came out in 1964.
Re: Western Bowie
Thanks everyone for your response
Re: Western Bowie
kootenay joe wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 3:12 pm I cannot say for sure it is the first of the Western 49's but it looks to have been buffed. I have never seen one with a mirror finish before. We do have a member who is an expert on this knife. Hope he chimes in.
kj
As to their having a mirror finish, this one is brand new in the box, never sharpened or carried, along with the original box, papers, and sales recite dated Dec 19, 1967. I purposefully took the pic inside under the light. Notice the reflection. I cannot speak for the OP knife. But the originals were quite well polished.
“There are things in the old Book which I may not be able to explain, but I fully accept it as the infallible word of God, and receive its teachings as inspired by the Holy Spirit.”
Robert E. Lee
Robert E. Lee
Re: Western Bowie
Beautiful Knife, thanks for sharingColonel26 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 9:51 pmkootenay joe wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2019 3:12 pm I cannot say for sure it is the first of the Western 49's but it looks to have been buffed. I have never seen one with a mirror finish before. We do have a member who is an expert on this knife. Hope he chimes in.
kjAs to their having a mirror finish, this one is brand new in the box, never sharpened or carried, along with the original box, papers, and sales recite dated Dec 19, 1967. I purposefully took the pic inside under the light. Notice the reflection. I cannot speak for the OP knife. But the originals were quite well polished. D3EC2E83-7D37-41F4-84B3-995E85C493A9.jpeg3B67083E-E3CB-4703-9590-4DDB1319943C.jpeg8252865E-BE4B-4E8A-97BB-A24B7700565B.jpeg9C04A162-8A67-4B19-9333-082BA46A717A.jpeg
Re: Western Bowie
Those are two beautiful knives. Someone had a heck of a Christmas present in 1967!
Mel
Re: Western Bowie
I have one like the OP and have sold another, both had a "satin" finish on the blades and were not shiny. Perhaps the first models had the satin finish and they went to full crocus (shiny) finish for the second version as the colonel shows. ZZZY, what say you regarding early versions with satin finish?? It is obvious that the OP knife has been buffed, all the brass is too bright.
- zzyzzogeton
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
- Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie
Re: Western Bowie
It's impossible for me to say what the 1st version had out the factory door as I have never encountered one IN PERSON. Every "Inverted Bowie" (IB) version, save 1, that I have/had/seen has either had a well-developed "use patina" or had that "rode hard and put up wet" appearance.
The lone shiny IB I have seen was an obvious polished up job. The stamps were really feathery looking. The owner insisted that it was a factory finish until I pulled out one that was well-used but had really clear, sharp stamps. He had always assumed that "shiny meant unused" and never paid attention to the condition of the stamps and what could be read from their condition.
It would appear that the OP knife has clear stamps, although I can't say for sure with my monitor and eyes. The overall condition of both knife and sheath would appear to be consistent with an unused/seldom used knife.
From my encounters with them, I could say that they were never sold with a box since I have never seen one. Obviously, that's a BS statement because naturally knives as large as the IBs with large sheaths came in boxes. I would love to see an original box from the IB era.
On another note, the Colonel's post pulls the dangler sheath introduction date into 1967. The 1968 catalog reprints indicate that the dangler sheath was "new for 1968". A knife sold on 19 Dec 1967 would have left the factory not later than November 67, and may have been sitting on the shelf for longer than that, depending on sales volume and stock rotation (did the clerks move older knives forward?) although knives don't spoil like food products.
Colonel -- could we get a picture of the backside of the sheath? That will show the rivet styles - solid or grommet style.
The lone shiny IB I have seen was an obvious polished up job. The stamps were really feathery looking. The owner insisted that it was a factory finish until I pulled out one that was well-used but had really clear, sharp stamps. He had always assumed that "shiny meant unused" and never paid attention to the condition of the stamps and what could be read from their condition.
It would appear that the OP knife has clear stamps, although I can't say for sure with my monitor and eyes. The overall condition of both knife and sheath would appear to be consistent with an unused/seldom used knife.
From my encounters with them, I could say that they were never sold with a box since I have never seen one. Obviously, that's a BS statement because naturally knives as large as the IBs with large sheaths came in boxes. I would love to see an original box from the IB era.
On another note, the Colonel's post pulls the dangler sheath introduction date into 1967. The 1968 catalog reprints indicate that the dangler sheath was "new for 1968". A knife sold on 19 Dec 1967 would have left the factory not later than November 67, and may have been sitting on the shelf for longer than that, depending on sales volume and stock rotation (did the clerks move older knives forward?) although knives don't spoil like food products.
Colonel -- could we get a picture of the backside of the sheath? That will show the rivet styles - solid or grommet style.
Re: Western Bowie
I’ll try to get some pics tonight. It’s raining cats and dogs here so they may have to be poor pics inside but I’ll do my best.
“There are things in the old Book which I may not be able to explain, but I fully accept it as the infallible word of God, and receive its teachings as inspired by the Holy Spirit.”
Robert E. Lee
Robert E. Lee
Re: Western Bowie
It’s still raining like crazy. I took several pics. Which I’ll post up in a different thread along with the story behind the knife. But here are the sheath pics.zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Mon Dec 16, 2019 5:48 pm It's impossible for me to say what the 1st version had out the factory door as I have never encountered one IN PERSON. Every "Inverted Bowie" (IB) version, save 1, that I have/had/seen has either had a well-developed "use patina" or had that "rode hard and put up wet" appearance.
The lone shiny IB I have seen was an obvious polished up job. The stamps were really feathery looking. The owner insisted that it was a factory finish until I pulled out one that was well-used but had really clear, sharp stamps. He had always assumed that "shiny meant unused" and never paid attention to the condition of the stamps and what could be read from their condition.
It would appear that the OP knife has clear stamps, although I can't say for sure with my monitor and eyes. The overall condition of both knife and sheath would appear to be consistent with an unused/seldom used knife.
From my encounters with them, I could say that they were never sold with a box since I have never seen one. Obviously, that's a BS statement because naturally knives as large as the IBs with large sheaths came in boxes. I would love to see an original box from the IB era.
On another note, the Colonel's post pulls the dangler sheath introduction date into 1967. The 1968 catalog reprints indicate that the dangler sheath was "new for 1968". A knife sold on 19 Dec 1967 would have left the factory not later than November 67, and may have been sitting on the shelf for longer than that, depending on sales volume and stock rotation (did the clerks move older knives forward?) although knives don't spoil like food products.
Colonel -- could we get a picture of the backside of the sheath? That will show the rivet styles - solid or grommet style.
“There are things in the old Book which I may not be able to explain, but I fully accept it as the infallible word of God, and receive its teachings as inspired by the Holy Spirit.”
Robert E. Lee
Robert E. Lee
- zzyzzogeton
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
- Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie
Re: Western Bowie
Colonel -
That's a great pic showing the solid rivets on the back of the Western Bowie/W49 sheaths. At some point down the road, some bean counter determined that replacing those 2 solid rivets with lanyard hole style rivets was cheaper in the long run because that's what Western did - no more solid rivets.
That's a great pic showing the solid rivets on the back of the Western Bowie/W49 sheaths. At some point down the road, some bean counter determined that replacing those 2 solid rivets with lanyard hole style rivets was cheaper in the long run because that's what Western did - no more solid rivets.
Re: Western Bowie
zzyzzogeton can you tell me what a KW version is?
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
Wayne
Please visit My AAPK store https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/catalog/btrwtr
Wayne
Please visit My AAPK store https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/catalog/btrwtr
- zzyzzogeton
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
- Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie
Re: Western Bowie
KW means Korean War. My post was intended to mean that the IB version (Inverted Bowie) was the first Bowie made by Western after WW2 and also after the Korean War.
Western's WW2 Bowie was the Bx54, it's authorized clone of the Collins No. 18 Pequeno Machete, improperly called the "V44", and was most likely the predecessor for the Bowie/W49.
I said/implied/hinted with the reference to post-WW2/KW that they were made after the KW ceasefire had been implemented. That's because I've seen a lot of folks say that the early "BOWIE" stamped bowies were Korean War vintage or 1950s vintage, which is bogus male bovine defecatory material.
Now when I say "BOWIE" here, I'm referring to the W49/brass S-guard knives. An argument could be made for the "Big 8", the L46-8, as being the first post-Wars (2 and KW) Bowie, since it is actually closer to the original Sandbar Fight Bowie than any of the later "wanna-bee" since it was first "re-introduced in the mid-1950s.
But that's a line of thought that needs it's own thread.
Western's WW2 Bowie was the Bx54, it's authorized clone of the Collins No. 18 Pequeno Machete, improperly called the "V44", and was most likely the predecessor for the Bowie/W49.
I said/implied/hinted with the reference to post-WW2/KW that they were made after the KW ceasefire had been implemented. That's because I've seen a lot of folks say that the early "BOWIE" stamped bowies were Korean War vintage or 1950s vintage, which is bogus male bovine defecatory material.
Now when I say "BOWIE" here, I'm referring to the W49/brass S-guard knives. An argument could be made for the "Big 8", the L46-8, as being the first post-Wars (2 and KW) Bowie, since it is actually closer to the original Sandbar Fight Bowie than any of the later "wanna-bee" since it was first "re-introduced in the mid-1950s.
But that's a line of thought that needs it's own thread.
Re: Western Bowie
What does "inverted Bowie" mean?zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:23 am KW means Korean War. My post was intended to mean that the IB version (Inverted Bowie) was the first Bowie made by Western after WW2 and also after the Korean War.
Western's WW2 Bowie was the Bx54, it's authorized clone of the Collins No. 18 Pequeno Machete, improperly called the "V44", and was most likely the predecessor for the Bowie/W49.
I said/implied/hinted with the reference to post-WW2/KW that they were made after the KW ceasefire had been implemented. That's because I've seen a lot of folks say that the early "BOWIE" stamped bowies were Korean War vintage or 1950s vintage, which is bogus male bovine defecatory material.
Now when I say "BOWIE" here, I'm referring to the W49/brass S-guard knives. An argument could be made for the "Big 8", the L46-8, as being the first post-Wars (2 and KW) Bowie, since it is actually closer to the original Sandbar Fight Bowie than any of the later "wanna-bee" since it was first "re-introduced in the mid-1950s.
But that's a line of thought that needs it's own thread.
David
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf
- zzyzzogeton
- Posts: 1722
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
- Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie
Re: Western Bowie
The word "BOWIE" is upside down compared to convention. By convention, I mean that the stamp is typically read with the knife in the right hand with the point pointing up. That puts the left side of the knife, the "mark" side, facing the observer. The term "mark side" comes from the convention of putting the "maker's mark" stamp on the left side ricasso so that a right handed person (vast majority of all users) can read the stamp when the knife is held.edge213 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 8:49 pmWhat does "inverted Bowie" mean?zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:23 am KW means Korean War. My post was intended to mean that the IB version (Inverted Bowie) was the first Bowie made by Western after WW2 and also after the Korean War.
Western's WW2 Bowie was the Bx54, it's authorized clone of the Collins No. 18 Pequeno Machete, improperly called the "V44", and was most likely the predecessor for the Bowie/W49.
I said/implied/hinted with the reference to post-WW2/KW that they were made after the KW ceasefire had been implemented. That's because I've seen a lot of folks say that the early "BOWIE" stamped bowies were Korean War vintage or 1950s vintage, which is bogus male bovine defecatory material.
Now when I say "BOWIE" here, I'm referring to the W49/brass S-guard knives. An argument could be made for the "Big 8", the L46-8, as being the first post-Wars (2 and KW) Bowie, since it is actually closer to the original Sandbar Fight Bowie than any of the later "wanna-bee" since it was first "re-introduced in the mid-1950s.
But that's a line of thought that needs it's own thread.
The "pile side" is the other side, i.e., right side of the knife. A knife's right side is called the "pile side" because the "anvil" or "assembly support" used by cutlers to assemble folding knives is called a "pile" dso the "pile side" of a knife is the side sitting on the pile while being assembled.
While not used for the assembly of fixed blades, the side nomenclature extends to fixed blades in description.
If you go back to the first picture in the original post, you can see that the orientation of the word "BOWIE" on the pile side would be upside down if the knife were held with the point up.
The second version had all 3 stamp lines on the mark side and none of them were inverted.
Why was "BOWIE" inverted and on the pile side for the first iteration? No one knows - it is just another one of the many mysteries surrounding Western Knife mythology.
Re: Western Bowie
Thank you sir, for the lesson.zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 10:26 pmThe word "BOWIE" is upside down compared to convention. By convention, I mean that the stamp is typically read with the knife in the right hand with the point pointing up. That puts the left side of the knife, the "mark" side, facing the observer. The term "mark side" comes from the convention of putting the "maker's mark" stamp on the left side ricasso so that a right handed person (vast majority of all users) can read the stamp when the knife is held.edge213 wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 8:49 pmWhat does "inverted Bowie" mean?zzyzzogeton wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:23 am KW means Korean War. My post was intended to mean that the IB version (Inverted Bowie) was the first Bowie made by Western after WW2 and also after the Korean War.
Western's WW2 Bowie was the Bx54, it's authorized clone of the Collins No. 18 Pequeno Machete, improperly called the "V44", and was most likely the predecessor for the Bowie/W49.
I said/implied/hinted with the reference to post-WW2/KW that they were made after the KW ceasefire had been implemented. That's because I've seen a lot of folks say that the early "BOWIE" stamped bowies were Korean War vintage or 1950s vintage, which is bogus male bovine defecatory material.
Now when I say "BOWIE" here, I'm referring to the W49/brass S-guard knives. An argument could be made for the "Big 8", the L46-8, as being the first post-Wars (2 and KW) Bowie, since it is actually closer to the original Sandbar Fight Bowie than any of the later "wanna-bee" since it was first "re-introduced in the mid-1950s.
But that's a line of thought that needs it's own thread.
The "pile side" is the other side, i.e., right side of the knife. A knife's right side is called the "pile side" because the "anvil" or "assembly support" used by cutlers to assemble folding knives is called a "pile" dso the "pile side" of a knife is the side sitting on the pile while being assembled.
While not used for the assembly of fixed blades, the side nomenclature extends to fixed blades in description.
If you go back to the first picture in the original post, you can see that the orientation of the word "BOWIE" on the pile side would be upside down if the knife were held with the point up.
The second version had all 3 stamp lines on the mark side and none of them were inverted.
Why was "BOWIE" inverted and on the pile side for the first iteration? No one knows - it is just another one of the many mysteries surrounding Western Knife mythology.
David
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf