Re: Show Us Your Camillus Knives!
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:26 am
Thank you Smitty.
All About Pocket Knives is a knife related resource center for buying, selling, researching, and discussing all things knives
https://allaboutpocketknives.com/knife_forum/
https://allaboutpocketknives.com/knife_forum/viewtopic.php?t=16588
Thank you Smitty.
Outstanding on both pickups!!!!!New_Windsor_NY wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:08 pm Yesterday, this pocket knife became the latest addition to my "general" CAMILLUS collection. It's a CAMILLUS 33, 2 blade, easy open, short line pocket knife. It didn't require any cleaning. I took some pictures and here it is.
That is a GREAT looking CAMILLUS 33!!!New_Windsor_NY wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 4:21 pm This is the latest addition to my CAMILLUS collection. It's a CAMILLUS 80 (my 2nd "80"), 3 blade, swelled center, milled liners, 3 5/8" closed, "whittler" pocket knife. It has a small crack in the handle, at the top pin. I am not concerned. It received a very minor cleaning. I took some pictures and here it is.
Click on a picture to ENLARGE.
Another 80 and a 33New_Windsor_NY wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:08 pm Yesterday, this pocket knife became the latest addition to my "general" CAMILLUS collection. It's a CAMILLUS 33, 2 blade, easy open, short line pocket knife. It didn't require any cleaning. I took some pictures and here it is.
Nice pieceGSPTOPDOG wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:35 am I was doing some cleaning on some of my older pocket knives and I pulled this one out and I found something curious. The tang stamps shown here on the two smaller blade are the Camillus’ three line arch stamps. The main blade looks like a Camillus’ three line straight stamp. The Camillus’ three line straight stamp (according to AAAPK) this stamp to have been used on knives manufactured from 1916 to the early 1930s. The Camillus’ three line arch stamp was used on Camillus knives in the early 1900s …estimate: circa 1902 to 1915. So, it looks like two times frames on this knife, maybe made with a new and older blades at the factory? Any Ideas? Also any ideas of a what this was called? Would it be considered a Stockman?![]()
GSPTOPDOG you picked up a sweet old whittler there. The different tang stamps makes it interesting. And love the old bones. Congratulations on that one and wonderful condition as well.GSPTOPDOG wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:35 am I was doing some cleaning on some of my older pocket knives and I pulled this one out and I found something curious. The tang stamps shown here on the two smaller blade are the Camillus’ three line arch stamps. The main blade looks like a Camillus’ three line straight stamp. The Camillus’ three line straight stamp (according to AAAPK) this stamp to have been used on knives manufactured from 1916 to the early 1930s. The Camillus’ three line arch stamp was used on Camillus knives in the early 1900s …estimate: circa 1902 to 1915. So, it looks like two times frames on this knife, maybe made with a new and older blades at the factory? Any Ideas? Also any ideas of a what this was called? Would it be considered a Stockman?![]()
Thanks! I have quite a few Camillus pocket knives, but I never really paid attention to the tang stamps until joining this site, so it is good to learn a little bit every day.doglegg wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:01 pmGSPTOPDOG you picked up a sweet old whittler there. The different tang stamps makes it interesting. And love the old bones. Congratulations on that one and wonderful condition as well.GSPTOPDOG wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:35 am I was doing some cleaning on some of my older pocket knives and I pulled this one out and I found something curious. The tang stamps shown here on the two smaller blade are the Camillus’ three line arch stamps. The main blade looks like a Camillus’ three line straight stamp. The Camillus’ three line straight stamp (according to AAAPK) this stamp to have been used on knives manufactured from 1916 to the early 1930s. The Camillus’ three line arch stamp was used on Camillus knives in the early 1900s …estimate: circa 1902 to 1915. So, it looks like two times frames on this knife, maybe made with a new and older blades at the factory? Any Ideas? Also any ideas of a what this was called? Would it be considered a Stockman?![]()
![]()
![]()
New_Windsor_NY wrote: ↑Wed Mar 17, 2021 2:08 pm Yesterday, this pocket knife became the latest addition to my "general" CAMILLUS collection. It's a CAMILLUS 33, 2 blade, easy open, short line pocket knife. It didn't require any cleaning. I took some pictures and here it is.
Thanks! It still is tight and good "walk & talk after all these years...a testament to a well made product. I found another early one I had stashed away and I will post that when I get a chance, it has a 2nd blade marked "sword" as I recall, I am going to check my old 1980's price guide/collector's book on that one. It has some good information, but does not go into a lot of depth.Ripster wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 12:50 pmNice pieceGSPTOPDOG wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:35 am I was doing some cleaning on some of my older pocket knives and I pulled this one out and I found something curious. The tang stamps shown here on the two smaller blade are the Camillus’ three line arch stamps. The main blade looks like a Camillus’ three line straight stamp. The Camillus’ three line straight stamp (according to AAAPK) this stamp to have been used on knives manufactured from 1916 to the early 1930s. The Camillus’ three line arch stamp was used on Camillus knives in the early 1900s …estimate: circa 1902 to 1915. So, it looks like two times frames on this knife, maybe made with a new and older blades at the factory? Any Ideas? Also any ideas of a what this was called? Would it be considered a Stockman?![]()
![]()
![]()
Camillus had different stamps for there smaller blades,from what I’ve only heard from good sources. And they where known for mixing things up, not wasting anything ,etc. etc. It’s possible they had too use the arch stamp to fit on the smaller blades and used the old 3 line on the main. Am curious now myself ,will do some more research and get back here with it ,if any info to share .
And as Dale reminds us once in a while, you can’t hang your hat on Camillus stamps, they mixed things up a bit, especially during transitions .
Very interesting piece ,Thanks for sharing
Beautiful HOK!GSPTOPDOG wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 3:35 am I was doing some cleaning on some of my older pocket knives and I pulled this one out and I found something curious. The tang stamps shown here on the two smaller blade are the Camillus’ three line arch stamps. The main blade looks like a Camillus’ three line straight stamp. The Camillus’ three line straight stamp (according to AAAPK) this stamp to have been used on knives manufactured from 1916 to the early 1930s. The Camillus’ three line arch stamp was used on Camillus knives in the early 1900s …estimate: circa 1902 to 1915. So, it looks like two times frames on this knife, maybe made with a new and older blades at the factory? Any Ideas? Also any ideas of a what this was called? Would it be considered a Stockman?![]()
Sounds like a real good plan TOPDOG!