'83 Les Paul

This forum is for anything & everything music. Post & discuss your favorite songs, artists, instruments, collectibles or memorabilia. Feel free to share original works or covers if you play or perform.
User avatar
Ridgegrass
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:04 pm
Location: Ocean City, MD
Contact:

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by Ridgegrass »

Didn't get rich but I thought the price was fair on both sides. One large store near Baltimore offered $1200 because he said the autograph ruined the price. Another guy said he'd pay $5K but, "didn't have the cash on hand". Same old story. I hate dealing with that, but I did well and somebody is going to enjoy it. Now, somewhere there's a lonely old Gibson or Martin acoustic, sitting in a closet waiting to be adopted. Come to your new Daddy. :D J.O'.
User avatar
toomanyknives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:47 am
Location: Georgia

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by toomanyknives »

Ridgegrass wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2023 1:59 pm Didn't get rich but I thought the price was fair on both sides. One large store near Baltimore offered $1200 because he said the autograph ruined the price. Another guy said he'd pay $5K but, "didn't have the cash on hand". Same old story. I hate dealing with that, but I did well and somebody is going to enjoy it. Now, somewhere there's a lonely old Gibson or Martin acoustic, sitting in a closet waiting to be adopted. Come to your new Daddy. :D J.O'.
Now for the fun part. The quest for the new (old) music maker from the past! Good luck on the hunt!
User avatar
Ridgegrass
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:04 pm
Location: Ocean City, MD
Contact:

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by Ridgegrass »

::tu:: Thanks.
User avatar
Ridgegrass
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:04 pm
Location: Ocean City, MD
Contact:

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by Ridgegrass »

A somewhat sad twist. The new owner wanted to take part of the signature off because it was signed to someone. Evidently he used some solvent that ate into the finish and messed up Les Paul's name too. A warning to us all. Know what you're doing when messing with modern finishes. Since nitrocellulose lacquer has been mostly banned, the new finishes can be very tricky. I've seen lots of self-proclaimed "experts" giving advice on the internet. Beware, this poor guy now has a regular old Les Paul Custom with a messed up top. Got to give a person a sick stomach. Sad story. J.O'.
User avatar
toomanyknives
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 5191
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:47 am
Location: Georgia

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by toomanyknives »

Ridgegrass wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:59 pm A somewhat sad twist. The new owner wanted to take part of the signature off because it was signed to someone. Evidently he used some solvent that ate into the finish and messed up Les Paul's name too. A warning to us all. Know what you're doing when messing with modern finishes. Since nitrocellulose lacquer has been mostly banned, the new finishes can be very tricky. I've seen lots of self-proclaimed "experts" giving advice on the internet. Beware, this poor guy now has a regular old Les Paul Custom with a messed up top. Got to give a person a sick stomach. Sad story. J.O'.
Boy, that is sad, J.O. I see it all the time. Gibson lacquer finishes can really get ruined by people that don't know what they're doing..
User avatar
Ridgegrass
Posts: 7351
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 2:04 pm
Location: Ocean City, MD
Contact:

Re: '83 Les Paul

Post by Ridgegrass »

Yep. Bummer.
Post Reply

Return to “The Music Forum”