Page 1 of 1
CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:30 pm
by badboycase101
IS THIS A CASE
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:23 pm
by Aimus Moses
The tang stamp was used by Case circa: 1903-1920. It's more important to read the knife and not the tang stamp though. Maybe one of the Case collectors that have much more Case knowledge than I will drop in and can give you more information.
Aimus
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:38 pm
by buckeyefan
Are there any other markings on it at all?
Can you make out if it says PA. beside or under the word BRADFORD?
What is the closed size?
Main blade looks like Razor, Not an electritions knife
Im thinking pre 20's
Im not an expert but I think you may have a real beauty there

Unless its another one of thoes FLEE bay scams
Marty
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:56 pm
by Aimus Moses
I thought I could see PA. after Bradford on the tang stamp Marty but my eyes aren't what they used to be. I can't enlarge the first picture of the knife to get a good look at it all, pins, bone jigging and etc. So just going by the tang stamp (which is a no-no in reality knife collecting) it looks to be a Case knife. Steve or one of the other Case guys may drop in to give a more detailed answer.
Aimus
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:01 pm
by Blade Runner
kinda favors an old WW1 navy issue, but those had a file secondary blade. Also Most of the ones I've seen were marked with a WR stamp
B-R

Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:17 pm
by Aimus Moses
Is it just my eyes or does the secondary blade look as if the file grooves were maybe ground off and the tip slightly re-profiled, in comparison to BR's knife example? Man, I need some new glasses, I can't see sh......uh...hardly anything anymore. I noticed the pins are in different places comparing the two different knives together.
Aimus
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:19 pm
by buckeyefan
Great knife you got there Bladerunner
I think you are right on the money calling Badboy's knife a WW1 Navy knife
HELLO AIMUS!
I agree the tang may say PA. after Bradford and not under. The stamp looks (to me) to be way high up on that tang tho, Is that right?
I really like the scales and jigging very much on BOTH knives posted here
Marty
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:24 pm
by buckeyefan
Aimus Moses wrote:Is it just my eyes or does the secondary blade look as if the file grooves were maybe ground off and the tip slightly re-profiled, in comparison to BR's knife example? Man, I need some new glasses, I can't see sh......uh...hardly anything anymore. I noticed the pins are in different places comparing the two different knives together.
Aimus
WOW Great eyes you have there AIMUS

In thi first pic it DOES look like a grind job! It even has the same "notch" at the tip...
But not in the 2nd pic
Im not even sure now that is the same knife in both pics???
Look at the grooves just above the tangs in both pics.
Marty
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:56 pm
by Knife Nut
I agree with Marty, those two pictures don't jive together.
Paul
Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:36 pm
by Blade Runner
Seems that the close up of the tang stamp has now changed to a different photo

I don't think the first one was the same knife

The first one was a Case Bradford stamp, I know I ain't had that many Budweisers yet

Re: CASE
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:49 pm
by badboycase101
ya i hade the wrong pic thank ya
Re: CASE
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:34 pm
by Gunsmoke47
On the pic of Badboys knife, the blades are reversed from the pic of BR's knife.
Re: CASE
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:13 pm
by buckeyefan
Gunsmoke47 wrote:On the pic of Badboys knife, the blades are reversed from the pic of BR's knife.
That's a fact JACK
Badboycase,
Are any or all of the knives you have posted pics of here at AAPK yours? Or are they knives you are looking at on the internet?
Just wondering pal
Marty
Re: CASE
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:23 pm
by Ramrod
Gunsmoke47 wrote:On the pic of Badboys knife, the blades are reversed from the pic of BR's knife.
Look the same to me. Look at the second pic.
Mark
Re: CASE
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:26 pm
by BIGHEAD
Yep same.
Re: CASE
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:50 pm
by gmusic
The blades are in the same position as BRs knife.
The two pictures that BB posted are of the same knife. Take a close look at the bottom of the pull in both pictures.
Pin holes were drilled by hand back in the day.
JMO
Re: CASE
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:13 am
by Gunsmoke47
Yeah I guess yall are right. To my old eyes, the pen/file looked in the rear of badboys. Guess it's just the shadow at the base of the tang. Hell to get old.
Re: CASE
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:34 am
by gmusic
It sucks smoke!
I have to wear mine to shave..............hate it!
Re: CASE
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:14 pm
by buckeyefan
gmusic wrote:The blades are in the same position as BRs knife.
The two pictures that BB posted are of the same knife. Take a close look at the bottom of the pull in both pictures.
Pin holes were drilled by hand back in the day.
JMO
Guys,
Badboys original post was of 2 different pics of 2 different knives, I am sure of that.
He said he changed the pics after the fact.
"ya i hade the wrong pic thank ya"
Marty
Re: CASE
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:24 pm
by gmusic
Yep, it looks like I came in late and missed the wrong pic post.
They are the same now, and I guess we answered your question BB?
Anyhow...............it looks like a Case to me.
Re: CASE
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:24 pm
by Knife Nut
I feel a wee bit dizzy after reading thru that entire thread.
Paul