Schrade oddities
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:09 pm
Hi All,
I have been rummaging around of late while being housebound after back surgery. (Boredom to the max trying to be as inactive as the doctor recommends.) I came across a Schrade Ltd. knife that I got in a multiple knife deal several years ago that baffles me. It came in a Schrade Walden hinged cardboard with an insert about Schrade Meerschaum. It most certainly is not. The Ltd mark makes me think end of days knife, the odd bolsters appear battered and bead-blasted and the scales look to me to be some random junk wood fitted.
My guess is that someone robbed the (likely) bone scales of the Ltd knife and traded out the cobbled together scales. The scales are clearly wood and seem to be delaminating near one pin and on the edges.It doesn't show well in my images.
Next is a pair of tipped 61OT knives that have me wondering if Camillus made one, for not only do I see through pins but also the bolsters are different lengths. At first I thought the through pinned one had been rebuilt until I noticed the bolster disparity. Odder yet, the through pins do not seem to be symmetrically placed in the bolsters. (The Camillus idea is due to the dimensional differences in construction I have seen with the uncle henry knives 897 vs 898 and 885 vs 886) Any ideas?
Regards,
Russell
I have been rummaging around of late while being housebound after back surgery. (Boredom to the max trying to be as inactive as the doctor recommends.) I came across a Schrade Ltd. knife that I got in a multiple knife deal several years ago that baffles me. It came in a Schrade Walden hinged cardboard with an insert about Schrade Meerschaum. It most certainly is not. The Ltd mark makes me think end of days knife, the odd bolsters appear battered and bead-blasted and the scales look to me to be some random junk wood fitted.
My guess is that someone robbed the (likely) bone scales of the Ltd knife and traded out the cobbled together scales. The scales are clearly wood and seem to be delaminating near one pin and on the edges.It doesn't show well in my images.
Next is a pair of tipped 61OT knives that have me wondering if Camillus made one, for not only do I see through pins but also the bolsters are different lengths. At first I thought the through pinned one had been rebuilt until I noticed the bolster disparity. Odder yet, the through pins do not seem to be symmetrically placed in the bolsters. (The Camillus idea is due to the dimensional differences in construction I have seen with the uncle henry knives 897 vs 898 and 885 vs 886) Any ideas?
Regards,
Russell