Page 1 of 1

Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:10 am
by Takoda
[album]The last time I needed help you guys were great. I need help again. At the base of the blades it says CHICAGO POCKET KNIFE Co. Any information will be greatly appreciated.

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:29 am
by kootenay joe
WOW ! I have never seen a knife of that pattern or brand & never seen any pen knife with the ball bolsters on both ends.
Goins lists "Chicago Pocket Knife Co." simply as "after 1940". He does not say what it was before 1940.
Whatever, your knife is older than 1940. I think it is more like 100+ years old and i think handles are ivory. Blades are quite worn down but uniqueness of the pattern makes it very collectible.
kj

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 7:21 pm
by knife7knut
someone posted a similar patterned knife awhile back(I think galvanic1882).Although I magnified the pictures I cannot tell whether it is indeed ivory or bone. I think it is bone. Nice catch even in the condition it is in.

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:03 pm
by btrwtr
I agree the handles are bone. I would guess the knife to be quite a bit older than 1940 and closer to the turn of the century.

There are several similar knives posted here. Maybe Dave, dcgm4 will have some insight.

Here is the link to an AAPK post with several similar examples. viewtopic.php?f=35&t=24141&hilit=big+be ... s&start=60

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:17 pm
by kootenay joe
I cannot see the dots of bone or the grain of ivory. My guess of ivory was based on the color. I don't mind being wrong.
kj

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2017 3:13 pm
by Takoda
Thanks to all who responded. Your help is greatly appreciated.

Re: Need help identifying this knife.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:55 pm
by RobesonsRme.com
Not arguing anybody's opinion, but if John Goins stated "After 1940", that's exactly what he meant. In his opinion, based on that tang stamp, the firm was founded after 1940.

Was he correct? I have no idea.

Charlie Noyes