Looks normal at first glance, right? Typical 301 stockman, 3 springs, 420HC stainless, 1990 date stamp. Ho-hum, right? Everybody's seen one. Yeah, I thought so too. Then I tried to open the blades...
See the curiosity yet? I'll offer a hint: On 3-spring Buck 301s, which side is the spey normally on?
That's right. The nail nicks on the spey and sheepsfoot blades are on the inside... and obscured by the master clip blade. I can get an angle on the sheepsfoot and open it while the master is closed but the spey cannot be opened without opening the master first (or getting a needlenose pliers).

I suspect that this knife was assembled wrong at the factory. I see no evidence that the knife has ever been apart, and most newer 301s I've seen have the spey on the same pivot as the master and the sheepsfoot on the opposite end. But this one is more like a traditional stockman (and like the older 2-spring Buck 301). If anything, the error makes it more noteworthy in my book.
Assembly mix-up aside, and considering how little I use the spey on most standard stock knives, I suspect I'll be giving this knife a ride in the near future.
