All About Pocket Knives

I've been looking at this and am 99.9% convinced it isn't right. The frame and small blade are correct, I think, but the master blade has been taken from another knife, restamped, and put into this frame. Compare the Russell lettering on the two blades. The lettering on the master blade runs at an angle and there are tooling marks on the tang. The pin through the bolster is protruding and is newer work. Clip blades aren't common on an original Russell. The seller says great shape, but the handles are broken on both sides. Only my opinion, but if he has a legitimate $50 bid on this knife he should take the money and run. I know there are members that can spot cold stamped blades. Has the master blade on this been cold stamped?


https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Clip-B ... 1438.l2649

I think you are right, but I am no expert. That tang stamp is suspicious, and the clip blade is in better condition. The "S" letters in Russell look different too, like the tops are flat on the pen blade but rounded on the clip blade. The reason he doesn't take the $50 and run is he is hoping for more (greedy?)

Agreed. The master blade opening past 180 degrees is not a good sign as well.

Additionally, the two retaining pins, on the handle and the prominent / evident one in the bolster doesn't look original to me.

I am not an expert on these knives by any means, but I have taken apart a very beat up old Russell straightline and from that experience, I can tell you the following

1. In the knife you pictured, it appears evident the end, middle and pivot rivets have all been replaced.
2. The replaced handle rivets appear to be n/s and larger than normal. Old Russells have thinner iron pins all the way around.
3. The main blade def. looks way wrong. That's not how they ground those blades, esp. the swedge above the nail nick.
4. Larger, more full style clip looks like its from a '30-'40s era knife, while the small blade and frame appear to be a genuine older Russell.
5. That said, the small blade in such great shape on a knife where the main blade has been replaced? Seems odd, however, it could be someone snapped the main blade and had a replacement legitimately done long ago (perhaps by Russell??) on warranty? Or from another Russell knife?

Lastly, the main blade RUSSELL stamp just looks off, but then again, I might be reading into it. One last question, does the main blade have a pronounced and distinct half stop at 90 degrees? It should. If it doesn't its most likely WRONG!

Check this out-

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37404&hilit=How+to+russell+barlow