Rotary tool jigging
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 8:08 pm
This isn't a counterfeit knife. Perhaps cobbled or reworked but certainly not factory original. The topic of rotary tool jigging has come up before but I saw this knife floating in the bay and thought it would be good to post it here.
Empire Winsted CT jumbo sleevebord pattern. The back handle isn't original and has been added to the knife with hand rotary tool jigging. I asked the seller if he thought the handle was original and he said he didn't really know. The auction was taken down so I'm not sure what happened to the knife.
If you look at the back handle you can see that whoever worked on the knife tried to replicate the jigging on the front handle. Notice first that the color is different. No big deal because you see that often enough on bone handled knives. Then notice that the front handle has very little if any flat surface to it. Jigging surfaces are all rounded off at the edges and the handle ends are rounded off and void of jigging mostly at the liners. This is typical of old factory bone and pocket wear does contribute to this over time.
The back handle doesn't have the rounding of the jigging surfaces that the front has and the handle ends at the liners have much more jigged surface than the front. As usual with rotary tool jigging done with a round bit there is a lot of depth and rounding to the jigging itself and there is more of a gouged look to it. Also note that some of the jigging is void of the dark dye that would be normal and as seen on the front handle. This isn't the worst example of dremel jigging I've seen but still looks pretty bad to me. Certainly not original to the knife.
Here are a couple of other AAPK posts about dremel type jigging. The first is back handle only. The second fornt and back.
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=68612&hilit=dremel
viewtopic.php?f=66&t=60978&hilit=dremel
Empire Winsted CT jumbo sleevebord pattern. The back handle isn't original and has been added to the knife with hand rotary tool jigging. I asked the seller if he thought the handle was original and he said he didn't really know. The auction was taken down so I'm not sure what happened to the knife.
If you look at the back handle you can see that whoever worked on the knife tried to replicate the jigging on the front handle. Notice first that the color is different. No big deal because you see that often enough on bone handled knives. Then notice that the front handle has very little if any flat surface to it. Jigging surfaces are all rounded off at the edges and the handle ends are rounded off and void of jigging mostly at the liners. This is typical of old factory bone and pocket wear does contribute to this over time.
The back handle doesn't have the rounding of the jigging surfaces that the front has and the handle ends at the liners have much more jigged surface than the front. As usual with rotary tool jigging done with a round bit there is a lot of depth and rounding to the jigging itself and there is more of a gouged look to it. Also note that some of the jigging is void of the dark dye that would be normal and as seen on the front handle. This isn't the worst example of dremel jigging I've seen but still looks pretty bad to me. Certainly not original to the knife.
Here are a couple of other AAPK posts about dremel type jigging. The first is back handle only. The second fornt and back.
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=68612&hilit=dremel
viewtopic.php?f=66&t=60978&hilit=dremel