OLD DAYS/ OLD WAYS
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:13 pm
I want to add some more to what I've already wrote and if there is any interest I'll try to continue with some "old yarn". I'm full of it I guess, as I grew up around a lot of the "last of the old folks" and was raised in what probably some would consider old ways. It was just a way of life to me and I guess I thought everyone was exposed to the same lifestyle.
Kenneth, the fox hunter I talked about was also a "mule man." I said in the earlier posts that "hides" brought a premium in the late ' 70's and maybe early ' 80's. So as with just about anything, from aluminum cans to mussel shells, it brought every hustler within gunshot out of the woodwork. The hides I'm referring to are animal skins. For this area it was primarily fox, coon, coyote, opossum, muskrat and a few others, but this will give you an idea. I'm not a hunter of any fashion anymore, but through talking to guys I know, hides aren't worth the time it takes to skin them now. Although it don't seem like it to me, this was about 30 yrs ago. A big coon could fetch $30-$40 and a fox or coyote would be in the $75 and up range. The animals mentioned aren't used for food and the prices being low before this time had built the populations up to I would assume a high that in all actuality needed to be thinned out just for their own survival. I also previously mentioned that fox and coon hunter's (in this case, hunter's who ran dogs) wouldn't dream of killing one of these animals, as the thrill was in the hunt. Even to make a few bucks when the hides got high, it would make a good case for biting off the nose to spite the face. I called the guys hustlers who started hunting these animals for monetary value simply because I don't think of them as "hunters" really, just opportunists. I have absolutely nothing against them personally because I have done this same type of thing in my lifetime. I never killed an animal for its hide but I have been known to dip into the pot when it runneth over. Divorced now, but at one time I had a wife who was a very good stay at home mom and 2 daughters. I worked 7 days a week for years and years until we divorced. I kept the girls and that meant staying in home more and I had to make money any way I could, honestly mind you. BUT this was me that didn't take these hustle hunter's personal........the TRUE hound hunter's very much took it personally. They were killing what they liked to hunt with hounds, for pleasure of the hunt. I knew quite a few men that were hide hunters and I never knew a single one to own a hound for the purpose of getting hides. Well how did they do it? I can name a few ways I know about. The worst or at least in my opinion, was I will call poaching. I think this would be the proper term here, and correct me if I'm wrong, because it's the only way I know to describe it. Here was one way they did it which may have been legal, I don't know but certainly unsportsman like in my opinion. Probably around for years but unheard of by me at this time, since I was still a sprout, were recorded calls for specific animals. The ones I seen were records and cassette tapes. The one's I remember best were the "rabbit in distress" and "chicken" tapes. The rabbit tape was used for coyote's and foxes and the chicken was used primarily for foxes. If any of you have hunted rabbits, you probably have at one time or another heard a rabbit after being shot that didn't die. They make an absolutely horrible "scream" sound, high pitched and piercing. That was the sound of this record or tape, meant to fool the coyote or fox into thinking a rabbit was in distress and easy prey for the taking. The chicken tape was just a squawking chicken. The fox in the henhouse thing used here. I will add that there were rumor's floating around about the rabbit tapes in particular that they had slowly killed a rabbit to make this recording. I don't like to think they did this but way back in the back of mind, I think the possibility is very high. This WAS the "70's and probably a pre-period on the drastic measures taken against such things today. Also the with the technology of today, they can do just about anything as folks well know. I know this kind of thing is politically incorrect for today to openly talk about but I wanted to include it as part of the story being told as I want to be as accurate as my memory will let me be. So back to the hide hunters. To help describe the area I live in, there is not a single traffic light in the entire county in which I live, today. So as you can imagine, 30 years ago, it would have been very easy to find a secluded spot to do your after hours hunting. They would hunt in at least pairs to be most effective and park their truck where they intended to take the animals being hunted. The tape or record player was connected to the cigarette lighter and sat in the bed of the truck. They would get in the bed also (guns ready) and start the "music." They had massive spotlights and when the time was right, one guy threw the light on the approaching animals and the other guy done the shooting. Many, many animals were taken in this very fashion. Like I stated, I don't know about the legality of this practice but it certainly lacked sportmanship in my opinion. This manner didn't really harm anyone but the animals being sought. Another method to get hides was of course trapping. This was a different story altogether. No one trapped at this time and although most everyone knew the basic technique it wasn't a practiced "hobby." So where is the best place to trap? Why where the foxes are naturally! For a little history on the fondness these old fox hunter's had for the animals I'll tell you a couple of things I can remember they did. I remember them having foxes shipped in here, and at a very great expense for that time period. Not only the foxes native to our area which are the GRAY fox and RED fox, but breeds not naturally found here. Sometimes they got in fox pups and sometimes they would get full grown foxes that had been trapped to be shipped for this purpose. Does anyone know the correct term for a fox pup? Come on before you google........A baby fox is called a kit. The only 2 types I can remember them shipping in different from the gray and red where what they called a SILVER fox and a BLUE fox. The blue I think was the rarer of the 2. They also bought ALL chickens anyone had to sell through the winter to feed "their" foxes. These would be turned lose alive and they also gathered up all the "corpses" after the weekend chicken fights......shhhhhh. So maybe you can imagine how these men felt when people started killing THEIR foxes. The foxes of course belonged to no one but we will say the actual hunter's were conservationists, conserving the life of the fox.....and the hide hunters were preservationists preserving an extra spot in their wallet for the money the hides would bring? Are either wrong? I can't answer for YOU, but aside from the spotlight hunting I feel both had every right to do what they did. The romantic side of me tends to lean towards the houndsmen, as most were either family or well known neighbors- which have become extinct themselves.......but that's a WHOLE other story in itself...............OK here I have bombarded a short book on you guys once again........BLAME PA KNIVES THIS TIME!!!! This of course is in the General category, so if anyone wants to hear anymore of this type of stuff let me know. I love talking (and writing) about it. Let me know what you think please.......good or bad. Do you like to read about it or had you rather Old Cope just shut up? Let's here from YOU........................
Brad
Kenneth, the fox hunter I talked about was also a "mule man." I said in the earlier posts that "hides" brought a premium in the late ' 70's and maybe early ' 80's. So as with just about anything, from aluminum cans to mussel shells, it brought every hustler within gunshot out of the woodwork. The hides I'm referring to are animal skins. For this area it was primarily fox, coon, coyote, opossum, muskrat and a few others, but this will give you an idea. I'm not a hunter of any fashion anymore, but through talking to guys I know, hides aren't worth the time it takes to skin them now. Although it don't seem like it to me, this was about 30 yrs ago. A big coon could fetch $30-$40 and a fox or coyote would be in the $75 and up range. The animals mentioned aren't used for food and the prices being low before this time had built the populations up to I would assume a high that in all actuality needed to be thinned out just for their own survival. I also previously mentioned that fox and coon hunter's (in this case, hunter's who ran dogs) wouldn't dream of killing one of these animals, as the thrill was in the hunt. Even to make a few bucks when the hides got high, it would make a good case for biting off the nose to spite the face. I called the guys hustlers who started hunting these animals for monetary value simply because I don't think of them as "hunters" really, just opportunists. I have absolutely nothing against them personally because I have done this same type of thing in my lifetime. I never killed an animal for its hide but I have been known to dip into the pot when it runneth over. Divorced now, but at one time I had a wife who was a very good stay at home mom and 2 daughters. I worked 7 days a week for years and years until we divorced. I kept the girls and that meant staying in home more and I had to make money any way I could, honestly mind you. BUT this was me that didn't take these hustle hunter's personal........the TRUE hound hunter's very much took it personally. They were killing what they liked to hunt with hounds, for pleasure of the hunt. I knew quite a few men that were hide hunters and I never knew a single one to own a hound for the purpose of getting hides. Well how did they do it? I can name a few ways I know about. The worst or at least in my opinion, was I will call poaching. I think this would be the proper term here, and correct me if I'm wrong, because it's the only way I know to describe it. Here was one way they did it which may have been legal, I don't know but certainly unsportsman like in my opinion. Probably around for years but unheard of by me at this time, since I was still a sprout, were recorded calls for specific animals. The ones I seen were records and cassette tapes. The one's I remember best were the "rabbit in distress" and "chicken" tapes. The rabbit tape was used for coyote's and foxes and the chicken was used primarily for foxes. If any of you have hunted rabbits, you probably have at one time or another heard a rabbit after being shot that didn't die. They make an absolutely horrible "scream" sound, high pitched and piercing. That was the sound of this record or tape, meant to fool the coyote or fox into thinking a rabbit was in distress and easy prey for the taking. The chicken tape was just a squawking chicken. The fox in the henhouse thing used here. I will add that there were rumor's floating around about the rabbit tapes in particular that they had slowly killed a rabbit to make this recording. I don't like to think they did this but way back in the back of mind, I think the possibility is very high. This WAS the "70's and probably a pre-period on the drastic measures taken against such things today. Also the with the technology of today, they can do just about anything as folks well know. I know this kind of thing is politically incorrect for today to openly talk about but I wanted to include it as part of the story being told as I want to be as accurate as my memory will let me be. So back to the hide hunters. To help describe the area I live in, there is not a single traffic light in the entire county in which I live, today. So as you can imagine, 30 years ago, it would have been very easy to find a secluded spot to do your after hours hunting. They would hunt in at least pairs to be most effective and park their truck where they intended to take the animals being hunted. The tape or record player was connected to the cigarette lighter and sat in the bed of the truck. They would get in the bed also (guns ready) and start the "music." They had massive spotlights and when the time was right, one guy threw the light on the approaching animals and the other guy done the shooting. Many, many animals were taken in this very fashion. Like I stated, I don't know about the legality of this practice but it certainly lacked sportmanship in my opinion. This manner didn't really harm anyone but the animals being sought. Another method to get hides was of course trapping. This was a different story altogether. No one trapped at this time and although most everyone knew the basic technique it wasn't a practiced "hobby." So where is the best place to trap? Why where the foxes are naturally! For a little history on the fondness these old fox hunter's had for the animals I'll tell you a couple of things I can remember they did. I remember them having foxes shipped in here, and at a very great expense for that time period. Not only the foxes native to our area which are the GRAY fox and RED fox, but breeds not naturally found here. Sometimes they got in fox pups and sometimes they would get full grown foxes that had been trapped to be shipped for this purpose. Does anyone know the correct term for a fox pup? Come on before you google........A baby fox is called a kit. The only 2 types I can remember them shipping in different from the gray and red where what they called a SILVER fox and a BLUE fox. The blue I think was the rarer of the 2. They also bought ALL chickens anyone had to sell through the winter to feed "their" foxes. These would be turned lose alive and they also gathered up all the "corpses" after the weekend chicken fights......shhhhhh. So maybe you can imagine how these men felt when people started killing THEIR foxes. The foxes of course belonged to no one but we will say the actual hunter's were conservationists, conserving the life of the fox.....and the hide hunters were preservationists preserving an extra spot in their wallet for the money the hides would bring? Are either wrong? I can't answer for YOU, but aside from the spotlight hunting I feel both had every right to do what they did. The romantic side of me tends to lean towards the houndsmen, as most were either family or well known neighbors- which have become extinct themselves.......but that's a WHOLE other story in itself...............OK here I have bombarded a short book on you guys once again........BLAME PA KNIVES THIS TIME!!!! This of course is in the General category, so if anyone wants to hear anymore of this type of stuff let me know. I love talking (and writing) about it. Let me know what you think please.......good or bad. Do you like to read about it or had you rather Old Cope just shut up? Let's here from YOU........................
Brad