Any Idea Who Made This One?

A place to ask or answer knife related questions.
Post Reply
User avatar
Paladin
Bronze Tier
Bronze Tier
Posts: 11943
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Near Austin, Texas, between a Rock and a Weird Place
Contact:

Any Idea Who Made This One?

Post by Paladin »

Guys, I am attaching photos of a Western Field fixed blade knife. I looks like it might have been made by Western but without the double tang, I doubt it was made by them.
Any ideas as to who might have made this for Montgomery Wards?

Ray
Attachments
1-IMG_2894.JPG
1-IMG_2895.JPG
1-IMG_2900.JPG
1-IMG_2901.JPG
Paladin

God Bless the USA
Please visit my store SWEETWATER KNIVES
"Buy more ammo" - Johnnie Fain
"I'm glad I ain't scared to be lazy." Augustus McCrae
knife7knut
Posts: 10697
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm
Location: Tecumseh,Michigan

Re: Any Idea Who Made This One?

Post by knife7knut »

I have a bunch of Western reject blades and that one looks quite a bit like their L66 model. Even the designation on the back of yours seems to cooberate that.Look at the top two blades in the picture.
Attachments
WesternRejects2017-1 013.jpg
Adventure BEFORE Dementia!
User avatar
zzyzzogeton
Posts: 1842
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 8:47 pm
Location: In the Heart of Texas on the Blackland Prairie

Re: Any Idea Who Made This One?

Post by zzyzzogeton »

Gut reaction is .... Western. :mrgreen: Note - edited to add pics

While MOST of the fixed blades Western produced from 1934 to 1990 were split-tangs, there were a significant number of models produced with "standard" full tang blades --- Bx54 Bushman, W49, W47, W45, W43, Westmark 701, 702, 702, all of the W-series fillet knives.

Here's my reasoning.

Western had a contract w/ Monkey Wards to make Western Field knives during the 1950s. This conclusion is based on split tang WF knives.

Western had a short-lived re-introduction of the WEST-CUT line with the K1/K2/K3/K5/645 knives in 1958. (Short-lived as they were NOT in the 1960 catalog pages.) The "K" knives were NOT made using split-tang. K1/K2/K3 were B&T knives, similar in size and shape to the (L/F) 58/48A/48B models.

The K1 = similar to the L58
10867

And I can't find my K2 pic ::dang:: - but it looks like an L48A :mrgreen:

The K3 = similar to the L48B
10868

The K5 is similar in size/shape of the 66 knives (L66/F66) of the same era.
10869

The 645 was a 2 pin hunter resembling other companies 1940s/1950s hunters.
10870

Without a flat picture with a ruler to show profile and blade/knife length clearly, it APPEARS that your knife is about 9" OAL. If so, it would be a twin sister to the K1 - 9-3/8" OAL, which was a single pin, non-split-tang B&T. If it's about 8" OAL, the K2 and if a tad over 7", the K3.

On a side note - I read somewhere once (and now can't find my copy of the info) that the Camillus 1005, 1006 and 1007 single pin, full tang fixed blades were made by Western. Also, if you compare the 1970s/1980s Camillus wood handled fillet knives to Western's fillet knives of the same era, they sure do resemble each other. ::hmm::
User avatar
Paladin
Bronze Tier
Bronze Tier
Posts: 11943
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Near Austin, Texas, between a Rock and a Weird Place
Contact:

Re: Any Idea Who Made This One?

Post by Paladin »

Thanks for all the help on this and apologies for failing to provide measurements. I got it at 9¼ inches OAL.
I think now it is one of those 'if it quacks like a duck, it must be a duck' situations or in this case, a Western.
Again, thanks for the info on this one.

Ray
Paladin

God Bless the USA
Please visit my store SWEETWATER KNIVES
"Buy more ammo" - Johnnie Fain
"I'm glad I ain't scared to be lazy." Augustus McCrae
Post Reply

Return to “Knife Related Q&A”