









Thanks for the info Dan, I hadn't even thought of Val-Test because honestly I didn't know they owned the rights to Simmons tang stamps - that just adds a whole new layer of confusion to Keen Kutter knives. BTW I bought this one from sharpshinyknives on ebay - I hadn't seen the other one here.danno50 wrote:Nice knives Jason and Joe! Joe, the handle replacement looks like it was well done quite some time ago. With fairly full blades and that spiral punch it is a nice old knife.
Jason, Sharpshinyknives has one just like the one in your last post in his AAPK store. It is a very distinctive clip blade. I am at a loss on it as to where it fits in. The tang stamps, on yours and on the one in the AAPK store, do not look quite right for old Simmons era Keen Kutters. I would not be surprised if they were more recent remakes, possibly in the 60s by Val-Test Distributors??
That's a good looking knife anyway Joe, I like the bone better than celluloid!!FRJ wrote:Here's a nice old knife that apparently has been recovered.
Sellens book says this should have Celluloid covers.
As it is, it has cracked jigged bone with a patch, thank you very much.
I love the spiral and those blades. And the pattern. And the stamp. And the nickel silver liners.
3 5/8" closed.
Sellens say "The trademark name and logo" were purchased by Val-Test in 1960. Perhaps Val-Test used both the EC Simmons and Keen Kutter names?? However, you are probably right and they are unauthorized reproductions, but, are they "reproductions" if they are a pattern that EC Simmons never made?msteele6 wrote:I've seen quite a few KK's in this pattern, can't remember seeing one that wasn't mint which always makes me think fake or "unauthorized" reproduction etc. It's hard not to assume this given the fact that E.C. Simmons name is on the tang. E.C. Simmons, of course, went out of business before WWII.
JMO
Thanks Roger for your comments. It took a while before I could get around taking another photo with the proper angle to see how the clip blade sits in the slot with the other blade. It seems to me to be pretty close to being the original length... but then again... I totally missed the replaced blade in the cokebottle... BTW thanks Jim for pointing that out... it is what it is I guess... still not too bummed about it tho... it is still my first of that pattern.peanut740 wrote:Ken,from the picture your sleeveboard looks short.Close it and look down from the top and see how far from the opposite bolster the blade ends.