Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

A place to discuss & share pictures of anything that relates to knives.

How much deviation from advertised blade length is acceptable to you on a brand new folding knife?

None
6
29%
Less than 1/16"
7
33%
1/16"
4
19%
1/8"
2
10%
1/4"
2
10%
1/2"
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

Picked up a couple of new knives from a well known American manufacturer recently that both had short from the factory blades compared to the advertised blade length.

Before I get to worked up about it I'd like to see what others feel is acceptable
Trace
User avatar
Railsplitter
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 4228
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:43 pm

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Railsplitter »

It depends on the overall size of the knife. I chose 1/4". Generally speaking, I would rather receive a blade shorter than advertised than longer than advertised unless the knife is tiny to begin with.
Rick T.

"What can this strange device be?
When I touch it, it gives forth a sound.
It’s got wires that vibrate and give music.
What can this thing be that I’ve found?”

Proud member of the Buck Collectors Club Inc.
Stanwade
Posts: 1926
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 6:40 pm
Location: Northwestern Pa

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Stanwade »

I chose 1/8" ..In this day and age retailers shouldn't have a problem providing accurate specs..
Ryan

“That’ll be the day”—-John Wayne
User avatar
Paladin
Bronze Tier
Bronze Tier
Posts: 11943
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 12:20 am
Location: Near Austin, Texas, between a Rock and a Weird Place
Contact:

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Paladin »

I think we need to define terms on this question. From where to where are we measuring? The tip is one obvious point for measurement but are we to measure to the end of the cutting surface or to the choil? To the bolster? Those all introduce some variation to the mix. Measure to the pivot pin maybe?
It seems better to go by the closed measurement of the knife and then I want to see a well that is pretty much 'full of blade'. Using that measurement there are no variables other than the increments on your measuring device. Most of mine break down into 1/8th inch increments so I try to stick by that. I rarely use 1/16th inch increments.
Well, opinions are like noses or that other body part and we all have one.

Ray
Paladin

God Bless the USA
Please visit my store SWEETWATER KNIVES
"Buy more ammo" - Johnnie Fain
"I'm glad I ain't scared to be lazy." Augustus McCrae
User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

Paladin wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:25 pm I think we need to define terms on this question. From where to where are we measuring? The tip is one obvious point for measurement but are we to measure to the end of the cutting surface or to the choil? To the bolster? Those all introduce some variation to the mix. Measure to the pivot pin maybe?
It seems better to go by the closed measurement of the knife and then I want to see a well that is pretty much 'full of blade'. Using that measurement there are no variables other than the increments on your measuring device. Most of mine break down into 1/8th inch increments so I try to stick by that. I rarely use 1/16th inch increments.
Well, opinions are like noses or that other body part and we all have one.

Ray
Folder blade length measurements as I have always seen defined is from the tip of the blade to the closest part of the handle with the knife fully open.

To be clear I am not focusing on the length of the sharpened edge which may or may not be the same as the blade length.
Trace
User avatar
jerryd6818
Posts: 39458
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Farther down the road.

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by jerryd6818 »

The accepted legal definition of blade length is:

Where a statute, regulation or ordinance refers to knife blade length, the measurement shall be the straight line extending from the tip of the blade to the forward-most aspect of the hilt or handle.
Forged on the anvil of discipline.
The Few. The Proud.
Jerry D.

This country has become more about sub-groups than about it's unity as a nation.

"The #72 pattern has got to be pretty close to the perfect knife."
--T.J. Murphy 2012
User avatar
edge213
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:48 am
Location: The Crossroads of America

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by edge213 »

To me. Blade length very important. I I purchased a knife and the blade was shorter than advertised, I would send it back.
A blade slightly longer than advertised would be acceptable.
David
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf
User avatar
peanut740
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 8133
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:32 pm
Location: Ohio, along the river
Contact:

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by peanut740 »

If it's a new knife,none.
Roger
User avatar
RevolverGuy
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 6:04 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by RevolverGuy »

It's never mattered to me. I think what the manufacturers do is list the blade length of the steel before the knives are sharpened. Since many require sharpening by hand, there will always be a slight deviation.
User avatar
Steve Warden
Posts: 6909
Joined: Wed May 27, 2015 4:18 pm
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Steve Warden »

::shrug:: I've never measured blade length on a new knife. Just something that never occurred to me. That said, if length was so far off that I noticed it, I'd have an issue. Don't ask me what that "so far off" length is. I have no idea. As I said, I'm not into measuring blade length. But that's me, so I didn't vote.
Take care and God bless,

Steve
TSgt USAF, Retired
1980-2000

But any knife is better than no knife! ~ Mumbleypeg (aka Ken)
User avatar
Mumbleypeg
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 15735
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:28 am
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Mumbleypeg »

Same here Steve. I didn’t vote. I can’ recall ever measuring blade length with a ruler or tape, nor paying any attention to the manufacturer’s specification. I do give it the eyeball test relative to the blade well, especially on used knives. If it is noticeably short I don’t buy it.

I suppose if I lived some place where maximum blade length was a legal requirement I would pay more attention. Thank God I don’t, at least not yet anyway.

Ken
Member AKTI, TSRA, NRA.

If your religion requires that you hate someone, you need a new religion.

When the people fear their government, that is tyranny. When government fears the people, that is freedom.

https://www.akti.org/
User avatar
bighomer
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 10813
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 11:07 pm
Location: N.mid.Tn.

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by bighomer »

Well like Sarge and Ken said I've never measured a new knife but I voted none, but I could probably live with a hair or two, really can't understand a manufacturer not keeping the tolerances to a bare minimum. Ymmv. ::handshake::
User avatar
btrwtr
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 5487
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:53 am

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by btrwtr »

On a new knife I don't know that I would care or worry too much about it up to the point that the blade does not appear to be full length. If it is noticeably short when closed I wouldn't want the knife and would consider this to be a quality defect.
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.

Wayne

Please visit My AAPK store https://www.allaboutpocketknives.com/catalog/btrwtr
User avatar
jerryd6818
Posts: 39458
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Farther down the road.

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by jerryd6818 »

I couldn't vote. There wasn't a category for "I don't give a flying fig". :mrgreen:
Forged on the anvil of discipline.
The Few. The Proud.
Jerry D.

This country has become more about sub-groups than about it's unity as a nation.

"The #72 pattern has got to be pretty close to the perfect knife."
--T.J. Murphy 2012
User avatar
peanut740
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 8133
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:32 pm
Location: Ohio, along the river
Contact:

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by peanut740 »

jerryd6818 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:42 pm I couldn't vote. There wasn't a category for "I don't give a flying fig". :mrgreen:
Jerry ::tu::
Roger
User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

jerryd6818 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:42 pm I couldn't vote. There wasn't a category for "I don't give a flying fig". :mrgreen:
Jerry, I would respectfully disagree with your 'I don't give a flying fig' statement. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that if you purchased a new folding knife and it were to arrive with a blade that was only half as long as the images and descriptions said it was supposed to be you might 'give a fig'.

In my case the blades aren't half advertised length but was definitely notable on inspection which is why I measured them. I will say that I have no other knives in my accumulation that have blades as drastically (at least drastic to me) as these 2. Which is why I was interested in others thoughts.
Trace
marinaio61
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 2:53 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by marinaio61 »

I only measure for blade length vs. local knife laws so I take the longest measurement which is from the end of the handle to the blade tip. My knives are all inexpensive brands, Victorinox and Buck, and I believe machine stamped blades are less likely to vary as much as hand crafted blades.
User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

marinaio61 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:29 pm I only measure for blade length vs. local knife laws so I take the longest measurement which is from the end of the handle to the blade tip. My knives are all inexpensive brands, Victorinox and Buck, and I believe machine stamped blades are less likely to vary as much as hand crafted blades.
Stay tuned, both my knives are from one of the brands you mentioned. Going to try and get some pics up after work depending on when we get done.
Trace
User avatar
jerryd6818
Posts: 39458
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Farther down the road.

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by jerryd6818 »

Rotten wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:14 pm
jerryd6818 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:42 pm I couldn't vote. There wasn't a category for "I don't give a flying fig". :mrgreen:
Jerry, I would respectfully disagree with your 'I don't give a flying fig' statement. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that if you purchased a new folding knife and it were to arrive with a blade that was only half as long as the images and descriptions said it was supposed to be you might 'give a fig'.

In my case the blades aren't half advertised length but was definitely notable on inspection which is why I measured them. I will say that I have no other knives in my accumulation that have blades as drastically (at least drastic to me) as these 2. Which is why I was interested in others thoughts.
Trace, I'm sorry if I offended your sensibilities. I didn't get specific enough, plus I was under the impression we were talking about new knives. I do care on used knives. A variance of 1/8" on a new knife would go un-noticed at this house. ::shrug::
Forged on the anvil of discipline.
The Few. The Proud.
Jerry D.

This country has become more about sub-groups than about it's unity as a nation.

"The #72 pattern has got to be pretty close to the perfect knife."
--T.J. Murphy 2012
User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

jerryd6818 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 11:44 pm
Rotten wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 7:14 pm
jerryd6818 wrote: Tue Jan 05, 2021 6:42 pm I couldn't vote. There wasn't a category for "I don't give a flying fig". :mrgreen:
Jerry, I would respectfully disagree with your 'I don't give a flying fig' statement. Maybe I'm wrong but I think that if you purchased a new folding knife and it were to arrive with a blade that was only half as long as the images and descriptions said it was supposed to be you might 'give a fig'.

In my case the blades aren't half advertised length but was definitely notable on inspection which is why I measured them. I will say that I have no other knives in my accumulation that have blades as drastically (at least drastic to me) as these 2. Which is why I was interested in others thoughts.
Trace, I'm sorry if I offended your sensibilities. I didn't get specific enough, plus I was under the impression we were talking about new knives. I do care on used knives. A variance of 1/8" on a new knife would go un-noticed at this house. ::shrug::
No sensibilities offended here :D ex wife got all my feelings (well most of them anyway)in the divorce years ago. If I hadn't had both of these side by side I probably wouldn't have noticed. Going to try and get some pics posted shortly.
Trace
User avatar
Rotten
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 1:47 am
Location: Texas panhandle

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by Rotten »

For starters I am not bashing Buck Knives.
I actually like these a LOT more than expected to, especially the micarta handled Pro version.
20210105_181636_HDR~2.jpg
These are both Buck 110s. A Select version and a Pro version. Buck specs listed on their website state they both have 3 3/4" blades. But you can see below that is not the case for my 2.
20210105_181549~2.jpg
20210105_181531~2.jpg
Had only one of them had a short blade I probably wouldn't have cared but both of them, really. The Select was purchased while on a road trip last Saturday and the Pro was purchased online and arrived yesterday. I have reached out to Buck and am awaiting a response, I know they are busy and probably short staffed and I will be patient.

The original intent of the poll was to see if I was just expecting to much from the manufacturer in that their products meet the listed specs.
Trace
User avatar
edge213
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:48 am
Location: The Crossroads of America

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by edge213 »

Rotten wrote: Wed Jan 06, 2021 12:37 am For starters I am not bashing Buck Knives.
I actually like these a LOT more than expected to, especially the micarta handled Pro version.
20210105_181636_HDR~2.jpg
These are both Buck 110s. A Select version and a Pro version. Buck specs listed on their website state they both have 3 3/4" blades. But you can see below that is not the case for my 2.
20210105_181549~2.jpg
20210105_181531~2.jpg

Had only one of them had a short blade I probably wouldn't have cared but both of them, really. The Select was purchased while on a road trip last Saturday and the Pro was purchased online and arrived yesterday. I have reached out to Buck and am awaiting a response, I know they are busy and probably short staffed and I will be patient.

The original intent of the poll was to see if I was just expecting to much from the manufacturer in that their products meet the listed specs.

I would definitely send both of them back to Buck.
David
"Glowing like the metal on the edge of a knife" Meat Loaf
User avatar
KLJ77
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2064
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:45 pm
Location: Virginia ~ Tidewater Area

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by KLJ77 »

Yep...I would question Buck's criteria on those blade lengths too. Either Buck does not follow the "legal definition" of blade length, as Jerry posted, or they have their own factory blade length measurements. Either way...this is a criteria I will now be looking at and evaluating.

Good thread.... ::tu::
LJ

"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living."
User avatar
FRJ
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 17147
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 1:43 pm
Location: Ct.

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by FRJ »

I would keep them and let Buck know that they have been greatly exposed and that knifers don't tolerate such deviation from advertised length in new knives.
Joe
User avatar
KLJ77
Gold Tier
Gold Tier
Posts: 2064
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:45 pm
Location: Virginia ~ Tidewater Area

Re: Advertised VS Actual Blade Length

Post by KLJ77 »

I have reached out to Buck and am awaiting a response,
Be sure to send them the photos of your measurements, if you haven't already done that.
LJ

"The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living."
Post Reply

Return to “General Knife Discussion”