


Steve -- If you take a look at the Olsen I posted, you'll notice it is most definitely not Swinden Key construction. From the match strike main pull to the profile of the clip secondary, the entire knife says Camillus to me.knifeaholic wrote:Every Olsen US made traditional slipjoint that I have ever seen matched Schrade tooling. I'm sure you have thought of this already, Glenn but if the knife has Swinden construction that nails it as a Schrade made knife.

Yes, yours looks like a German made Olsen knockoff of the 863. That's why I was careful to say "US Made Olsen" in my reply.jerryd6818 wrote:Steve -- If you take a look at the Olsen I posted, you'll notice it is most definitely not Swinden Key construction. From the match strike main pull to the profile of the clip secondary, the entire knife says Camillus to me.knifeaholic wrote:Every Olsen US made traditional slipjoint that I have ever seen matched Schrade tooling. I'm sure you have thought of this already, Glenn but if the knife has Swinden construction that nails it as a Schrade made knife.
Glenn's knife on the other hand? As I said before, I would have to agree, Schrade (or maybe Ulster??).
"German made Olsen knockoff"? That confuses me. (yes, the knife I posted is stamped "Germany Solingen" so more of a Camillus knockoff made in Germany with an Olsen stamp)knifeaholic wrote:Yes, yours looks like a German made Olsen knockoff of the 863. That's why I was careful to say "US Made Olsen" in my reply.

I should have been more clear. IMO yours is a knife made in Germany on contract for Olsen, but a knockoff of the Schrade 863 or equivalent Camillus pattern (I do not know the Camillus pattern # off the top of my head). So its a knockoff in the sense that some German firm was copying an American pattern in making the knife on contract for Olsen.jerryd6818 wrote:"German made Olsen knockoff"? That confuses me. (yes, the knife I posted is stamped "Germany Solingen" so more of a Camillus knockoff made in Germany with an Olsen stamp)knifeaholic wrote:Yes, yours looks like a German made Olsen knockoff of the 863. That's why I was careful to say "US Made Olsen" in my reply.
Are you saying Schrade is the originator of this pattern? If so, I would have to strongly disagree. I would have to say Camillus was the first out with the Carpenter's & Whittler's pattern just after WWII in 1946 and the Schrade 863, plus the Ulster 63 along with all others are "knockoffs" of the Camillus #72.
If I misunderstood your intent, please enlighten me. The whole knife industry inbreeding gets very confusing for me.I sometimes think I'm in the wrong hobby for my personality.
If any Ulster had Swinden construction, it was made in the Schrade buildings, not Ulster (by name) buildings. However, I think maybe Schrade moved into some of the Ulster buildings, so this may be moot. Meanwhile, I am going to look at the pre-1947 Schrade catalogs tomorrow when I get off work, because I think this pattern was in one of the pages.knifeaholic wrote: But both Ulster and Schrade knives used the Swinden system.

Ulster knives were definitely made with Swinden construction, as I have seen them disassembled. It really is moot since Imperial/Schrade/Ulster were the same company, equipment and/or production could have been moved around from one plant location to another. In theory any knife with any of their owned trademark stamps could have been made in any one of the plants.tongueriver wrote:If any Ulster had Swinden construction, it was made in the Schrade buildings, not Ulster (by name) buildings. However, I think maybe Schrade moved into some of the Ulster buildings, so this may be moot. Meanwhile, I am going to look at the pre-1947 Schrade catalogs tomorrow when I get off work, because I think this pattern was in one of the pages.knifeaholic wrote: But both Ulster and Schrade knives used the Swinden system.
If you find it, would love to see a copy of that page from the catalog.tongueriver wrote:If any Ulster had Swinden construction, it was made in the Schrade buildings, not Ulster (by name) buildings. However, I think maybe Schrade moved into some of the Ulster buildings, so this may be moot. Meanwhile, I am going to look at the pre-1947 Schrade catalogs tomorrow when I get off work, because I think this pattern was in one of the pages.knifeaholic wrote: But both Ulster and Schrade knives used the Swinden system.

I have also seen Ulster knives made with the Swinden system, as well as Imperial. We also know the different companies most likely made parts for one another, as well as completed knives. However, I believe the only company to have a Swinden machine was the Schrade plant; this according to Phil Gibbs (of Camillus). So if he is correct, (and I believe he is), the only thing we can know with 100% certainty is that if the knife has the Swinden system, it was made in the Schrade factory.knifeaholic wrote: Ulster knives were definitely made with Swinden construction, as I have seen them disassembled. It really is moot since Imperial/Schrade/Ulster were the same company, equipment and/or production could have been moved around from one plant location to another. In theory any knife with any of their owned trademark stamps could have been made in any one of the plants.
I would like to see that is well.jerryd6818 wrote:If you find it, would love to see a copy of that page from the catalog.

Just because it is not in the picture catalog does not indicate they did not offer them. However, I have a 1950 price list... no 863. I think there was some lag time from when the stopped the 8663 3/4 and began the 863. But that is just Schrade, and then there is Ulster to consider.jerryd6818 wrote:Thanks. That clears up some things. The 863 wasn't in the 1947 catalog but it was in the 1954 catalog.

Awesome.thawk wrote:Just because it is not in the picture catalog does not indicate they did not offer them. However, I have a 1950 price list... no 863. I think there was some lag time from when the stopped the 8663 3/4 and began the 863. But that is just Schrade, and then there is Ulster to consider.jerryd6818 wrote:Thanks. That clears up some things. The 863 wasn't in the 1947 catalog but it was in the 1954 catalog.![]()