but many of my antique / vintage knife acquired for display in a collection have dull blades. Now I've been pondering...
do I keep them the way that they are in order to have the blades as close to original as possible or...
should I sharpen them so that they are more functional (after all that is how a knife should be) even though I'd probably never carry them... and the reason I don't use them is I don't want to take the chance in damaging them beyond the condition they are already in. When I first obtained the Schrade Cut Co. seen as my avatar, I used to carry it everywhere because it's sharp as a razor, but as time went on I would become more & more concerned that something might happen to it & would be nearly impossible to replace. So I stopped carrying it. Same goes for a MoP Dwight Devine Ulster cattle knife I would stick in my pocket from time to time. Even though I had only paid $6 for it, it would be irreplaceable were something to happen to the MoP handles or the one of the blades...
Any way... getting a bit off topic... just want to get some opinions on whether or not to sharpen dull blades on old nearly irreplaceable knives that are intended to be collected only... or am I just going off the deep end here?
With thoughts like these rattling around my head... no wonder I've lost all my hair...


(I sure like getting to use these emojis). I would on occasion carry an antique knife... ie., going out to dinner or to visit with friends (when such activities were allowed... seems so long ago... but I digress)... but I no longer bring them on vacation trips... I think that's how I lost my Old Timer & I almost had my little Schrade Cut. Co. confiscated. What it comes down to I guess is I find greater pleasure in just displaying them... and like I said just carry vintage knives that still can be fairly easily replaced if something unfortunate should happen to it.